GREEN CINE Already a member? login
 Your cart
Help
Advanced Search
- Genres
+ Action
+ Adult
+ Adventure
+ Animation
+ Anime
+ Classics
+ Comedies
+ Comic Books
+ Crime
  Criterion Collection
+ Cult
+ Documentary
+ Drama
+ Erotica
+ Espionage
  Experimental/Avant-Garde
+ Fantasy
+ Film Noir
+ Foreign
+ Gay & Lesbian
  HD (High Def)
+ Horror
+ Independent
+ Kids
+ Martial Arts
+ Music
+ Musicals
  Pre-Code
+ Quest
+ Science Fiction
  Serials
+ Silent
+ Sports
+ Suspense/Thriller
  Sword & Sandal
+ Television
+ War
+ Westerns


Public Discussions

topics
GreenCine Movie Talk
Anime
Discuss all topics related to anime.
561

Random Nudity?
Topic by: Battie
Posted: June 15, 2005 - 2:24 PM PDT
Last Reply: August 10, 2005 - 4:46 PM PDT

page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  >>      prev | next
author topic: Random Nudity?
Battie
post #21  on June 17, 2005 - 12:47 PM PDT  
> On June 17, 2005 - 1:40 AM PDT dvyi wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> cant go wrong with nudity.. unless its male nudity i guess
> ---------------------------------

>:| I resent that.
woozy
post #22  on June 17, 2005 - 12:54 PM PDT  
> On June 17, 2005 - 12:47 PM PDT Battie wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> > On June 17, 2005 - 1:40 AM PDT dvyi wrote:
> > ---------------------------------
> > cant go wrong with nudity.. unless its male nudity i guess
> > ---------------------------------
>
> >:| I resent that.
> ---------------------------------

can't go wrong with nudity... unless it's *my* nudity, and you didn't pay me first.

Cugat
post #23  on June 17, 2005 - 3:00 PM PDT  
On June 17, 2005 - 12:18 PM PDT ahogue wrote:
> I'd like to make a short film in which people are naked and talking constantly about the fact that they are naked but you never see anyone below the neck.

You'd need an interesting plot/situation to drape that concept over I think.
Otherwise I'm imagining the stuff I could miss and not care about on Mad/SNL.
shiori308
post #24  on June 18, 2005 - 1:26 AM PDT  
> On June 17, 2005 - 3:00 PM PDT Cugat wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> On June 17, 2005 - 12:18 PM PDT ahogue wrote:
> > I'd like to make a short film in which people are naked and talking constantly about the fact that they are naked but you never see anyone below the neck.
>
> You'd need an interesting plot/situation to drape that concept over I think.
> Otherwise I'm imagining the stuff I could miss and not care about on Mad/SNL.
> ---------------------------------

I don't know, I think that might be a genius idea... if you make the main focus of the plot their nudity but never show their nudity but make the dialogue compelling enough... you have a great independent film in the making there. Might have to steal that idea!! It's kind of a jump back in time when they couldn't show the vulgarity of mankind like they can today but they suggested it anyway because people back then still knew how to use their imagination to expand the plot to their liking.
Cugat
post #25  on June 18, 2005 - 2:07 AM PDT  
On June 18, 2005 - 1:26 AM PDT shiori308 wrote:
> On June 17, 2005 - 3:00 PM PDT Cugat wrote:
> > On June 17, 2005 - 12:18 PM PDT ahogue wrote:
> > > I'd like to make a short film in which people are naked and talking constantly about the fact that they are naked but you never see anyone below the neck.
> >
> > You'd need an interesting plot/situation to drape that concept over I think.
> > Otherwise I'm imagining the stuff I could miss and not care about on Mad/SNL.
>
> I don't know, I think that might be a genius idea... if you make the main focus of the plot their nudity but never show their nudity but make the dialogue compelling enough... you have a great independent film in the making there. Might have to steal that idea!!

Feel free to keep the process open, I'd be interested to see how it goes.

> It's kind of a jump back in time when they couldn't show the vulgarity of mankind like they can today but they suggested it anyway because people back then still knew how to use their imagination to expand the plot to their liking.

"Is Max Headroom still refusing to wear pants!?"
Cosplayer
post #26  on June 18, 2005 - 11:08 AM PDT  
Maybe they could talk about how naked and hot they are, but when you pan out, it turns out they are aliens and are lizards below the neck.
Cugat
post #27  on June 18, 2005 - 12:06 PM PDT  
On June 18, 2005 - 11:08 AM PDT Cosplayer wrote:
> Maybe they could talk about how naked and hot they are, but when you pan out, it turns out they are aliens and are lizards below the neck.

Then we pan to a clunky animatronic Rod Serling who wraps the show up. :-)
shiori308
post #28  on June 18, 2005 - 12:25 PM PDT  
Or perhaps they are talking about being naked but when you pan out you find that they are a couple of hippies discussing philosophical ideas and they were talking about the bare-nakedness of their souls.

ahogue
post #29  on June 18, 2005 - 6:36 PM PDT  
> On June 18, 2005 - 11:08 AM PDT Cosplayer wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> Maybe they could talk about how naked and hot they are, but when you pan out, it turns out they are aliens and are lizards below the neck.
> ---------------------------------

I was thinking more like, when you pan out there happens to be two gigantic pepsi cans positioned just right so it covers them both up to their necks.

Even better, you could establish that there are two cans or something sitting on a table nearby and use those in all non-closeups to obscure their nakedness.
shiori308
post #30  on June 19, 2005 - 4:20 AM PDT  
> On June 18, 2005 - 6:36 PM PDT ahogue wrote:

>
> I was thinking more like, when you pan out there happens to be two gigantic pepsi cans positioned just right so it covers them both up to their necks.
>
> Even better, you could establish that there are two cans or something sitting on a table nearby and use those in all non-closeups to obscure their nakedness.
> ---------------------------------

It would be kind of like Home Improvement and Wilson's face and the various objects that they would strategically place to cover it... except with genitalia and pop cans. Hmmm.... I like it ahogue!!

woozy
post #31  on June 19, 2005 - 9:10 AM PDT  
I like the idea of the camera never panning out. strategically placed objects is too cliche and teasing. But the bluntly talking about how naked they are "Hey, I'm naked!" "Wow, you look great naked" is just really funny.
ahogue
post #32  on June 20, 2005 - 2:24 PM PDT  
> On June 19, 2005 - 9:10 AM PDT woozy wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> I like the idea of the camera never panning out. strategically placed objects is too cliche and teasing. But the bluntly talking about how naked they are "Hey, I'm naked!" "Wow, you look great naked" is just really funny.
> ---------------------------------

You're right. It's been done.
dvyi
post #33  on June 20, 2005 - 2:37 PM PDT  
strategically place items to block out everything except the private parts

that has never been done..

or make a movie where you only see the characters naked, but never see their face.
dvyi
post #34  on June 20, 2005 - 2:41 PM PDT  
or.. make the nose be our new reproductive organ, and the sneeze is the end product of stimulation. then picking your nose would be like fingering yourself.


and you can wear nose bikinis, and n-strings.

ahogue
post #35  on June 20, 2005 - 3:09 PM PDT  
> On June 20, 2005 - 2:41 PM PDT dvyi wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> or.. make the nose be our new reproductive organ, and the sneeze is the end product of stimulation. then picking your nose would be like fingering yourself.
>
>
> and you can wear nose bikinis, and n-strings.
>
>
> ---------------------------------

Well now, safe to say that's never been done.
shiori308
post #36  on June 20, 2005 - 10:42 PM PDT  
> On June 20, 2005 - 3:09 PM PDT ahogue wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> > On June 20, 2005 - 2:41 PM PDT dvyi wrote:
> > ---------------------------------
> > or.. make the nose be our new reproductive organ, and the sneeze is the end product of stimulation. then picking your nose would be like fingering yourself.
> >
> >
> > and you can wear nose bikinis, and n-strings.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
>
> Well now, safe to say that's never been done.
> ---------------------------------

Oh yeah that's hot. A new generation of strange fetishes has been born.

ahogue
post #37  on June 21, 2005 - 10:41 AM PDT  
> On June 20, 2005 - 10:42 PM PDT shiori308 wrote:
> ---------------------------------
>
> Oh yeah that's hot. A new generation of strange fetishes has been born.
> ---------------------------------

Well, at least as fetishes go that's a comparatively harmless one.

Okay, actually most are harmless. But not all!
dvyi
post #38  on June 21, 2005 - 12:51 PM PDT  
probobly not shiori's.. i bet she loves to hurt people
ahogue
post #39  on June 21, 2005 - 1:06 PM PDT  
> On June 21, 2005 - 12:51 PM PDT dvyi wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> probobly not shiori's.. i bet she loves to hurt people
> ---------------------------------

I dunno. She seems awfully nice to me.
Battie
post #40  on June 21, 2005 - 2:40 PM PDT  
> On June 21, 2005 - 1:06 PM PDT ahogue wrote:
> ---------------------------------
> > On June 21, 2005 - 12:51 PM PDT dvyi wrote:
> > ---------------------------------
> > probobly not shiori's.. i bet she loves to hurt people
> > ---------------------------------
>
> I dunno. She seems awfully nice to me.
> ---------------------------------

I'm putting money down on her being a Domme in secret. She doesn't have that "I want to hurt you" attitude...just the, "You'll do what I say" attitude. Rotfl.
page  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  >>      prev | next

about greencine · donations · refer a friend · support · help · genres
contact us · press room · privacy policy · terms · sitemap · affiliates · advertise

Copyright © 2005 GreenCine LLC. All rights reserved.
© 2006 All Media Guide, LLC. Portions of content provided by All Movie Guide®, a trademark of All Media Guide, LLC.