:
Denzel Washington,
Denzel Washington,
Meryl Streep,
more...
:
Jonathan Demme,
Jonathan Demme
see all cast/crew...
: 
: Paramount
: Political Thriller
: 129 min.
: English, French
: English, Spanish
see additional details...
|
|
Jonathan Demme directed this updated remake of John Frankenheimer's 1962 cult favorite The Manchurian Candidate, a pioneering examination of political conspiracy and psychological reconditioning. Major Bennett Marco (Denzel Washington) and Sergeant Raymond Shaw (Liev Schreiber) are two soldiers who served in the same company during Operation Desert Storm, but their paths following their tours of duty have been very different. Shaw, the son of powerful congresswoman Eleanor Shaw (Meryl Streep), has used his reputation as a war hero to quickly scale the ladder of American politics, and with the help of his mother earns the Vice Presidential nomination. Marco, on the other hand, has been troubled with mental illness, and is convinced that something strange happened to him and his compatriots during the war. As Marco struggles to find the truth behind his nightmares and emotional torment, he unearths some disturbing facts about how his mind and body have been reworked by shadowy forces, as well as those of his fellow soldiers -- including Raymond Shaw. Featuring a stellar supporting cast (including Jon Voight, Miguel Ferrer, Ted Levine, and Dean Stockwell), The Manchurian Candidate credits George Axelrod's screenplay for the 1962 film as its source, as opposed to Richard Condon's 1959 novel from which Axelrod adapted his script. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
|
| Meanwhile, back at the ranch...
by chocopups
August 17, 2005 - 3:16 PM PDT
|
|
|
0 out of 3 members found this review helpful
|
| This is a decent effort by all involved, but it's undercut by the fact that we don't have to watch a movie to picture a lapdog of a global military contractor a heartbeat away from the presidency. |
| A Worthy Remake
by talltale
December 16, 2004 - 7:15 AM PST
|
|
|
4 out of 6 members found this review helpful
|
| Fans of the original MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE will find a lot of like in this updated version. There are enough subtle (and not so) changes to the story to keep you on your toes, and director Demme has shot through this remake with an even stronger sense of paranoia than the original (which had a lot more humor and off-the-wall charm, probably thanks to George Axelrod's script). No wonder so many characters react to Denzel Washington as though his character were a nut: He comes off like one for much of the movie. Cleverly, the film manages to counteract my own strongest objection to it (with all their power and control, the bad guys would have killed off Denzel as soon as he started making waves. Hmmm, maybe not). And, unless I missed something major, this update leaves the door ajar as to what REALLY happened--and why. You'll probably argue about this with your friends, and for good reason. Still, after viewing this state-of-the-art thriller I have to admit understanding why it was not a big hit (it did so-so at the American box-office and not much worldwide). It weaves into its plot a lot of references to our present situation (terror alerts, a rich and powerful worldwide company exerting behind-the-scenes control) that just plain make viewers feel too uncomfortable: post-election, with the release of the DVD, even more so than pre-, when the film was in movie theatres. This is not necessarily a negative judgment, but I believe it's the major reason the movie was not heartily embraced and recommended. Americans don't like what makes us feel uncomfortable--and even more paranoid than we already are. "The Parallax View" was not a big hit in its day, either. |
| Give This Candidate A Chance
by ZenBones
December 1, 2004 - 11:57 AM PST
|
|
|
5 out of 7 members found this review helpful
|
I began to condemn this film before I even saw it. The original film was a near-masterpiece that in my opinion couldn't be topped, and I tend to have an allergy to today's slick, big-budget Hollywood thrillers. I can't say this film topped the original film, but it does have enough merit to exist as its contemporary equal. The two films are quite different in technique but they share a stunning ability to tap into the political consciousness of their eras. The original "Manchurian Candidate" unintentionally foreshadowed one of the most key events in American history; a political assassination captured live on TV. Can the events depicted in this film keep us guessing as to what is in store for us in the near future? Let's see, do our government leaders have political and financial ties with large corporations that make huge profits from war? Are there new technologies that are crossing moral boundaries regarding our privacy, and new laws that allow them to do that in order to 'protect our democracy'? Does the media keep us terrified of unseen enemies, while assuring us that the secrecy in our government is necessary to fight those unseen enemies? And... is it possible that in the near future, politicians and the industries that bought and paid for them will do ANYTHING to remain in power; including brainwashing and murder? Like the phrase that rang out throughout this year's campaigning: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid! If nothing else, the paranoia depicted in this film matches the emotional climate of today.
Even if you chose not to buy into the inauspicious signs proposed by this film, you can still enjoy it all as a finely crafted, searing potboiler that keeps you coiled up throughout its duration. I had a bit of a problem with Meryl Streep's hammy performance, but Denzel Washington is great and Liev Schreiber is a revelation. And... despite the fact that this film IS a slick, big-budget Hollywood thriller, I didn't feel a need to heave once. How's that for a great recommendation! |
|
|
GreenCine Member Rating
(Average 5.92)
115 Votes
add to list 
|
|
|
Your cart
morpheme
KBishop
© 2006 All Media Guide, LLC. Portions of content provided by All Movie Guide®,
a trademark of All Media Guide, LLC.